O'Campo

(PC) Crump v. O'Campo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20212:20-cv-02343California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE CRUMP, No. 2:20-cv-2343 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. O’CAMPO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 28, 2020, plaintiff filed a request that the court disregard his amended complaint and have this action proceed on his original complaint. However, the court has screened plaintiff’s amended complaint, ordered service of process on defendant O’Campo, who has filed a notice of intent to waive service. In addition, the remaining two defendants, also named in the original complaint, were voluntarily dismissed by plaintiff. Plaintiff fails to explain why he wants to proceed on his original complaint, which appears to contain essentially the same allegations as those raised in his amended complaint except that the original complaint appended exhibits. Plaintiff is not required to provide exhibits with his pleading. That…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.