Asmar
Asmar v. BNSF Railway Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARBEL ASMAR; ANTOINE ASMAR; No. 1:19-cv-01810-HBK
SIHAM KHALIL,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiffs, MOTION TO SEAL AND DIRECTING v. CLERK TO MAINTAIN VIDEO EVIDENCE
UNDER SEAL FURTHER TO 1/25/
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY; AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
DOES 1-20, INCLUSIVE,
(Doc. No. 20) Defendants.
Pending before the Court is Defendant BNSF Railway Company’s motion to seal, with 18 supporting points and authorities and declaration of Jeremy J. Schroeder, Esq. in support filed on 19 November 18, 2020. (Doc. Nos. 20, 20-1, 20-2). The court has not received Plaintiff’s notice of 20 opposition. Local Rule 141(d). This matter is ripe for review. 21 This action is a wrongful death claim pursed by the decedent’s family involving a train 22 verses a pedestrian accident. See generally Complaint, Doc. 1-1. Defendant seeks to seal a locomotive video, which is attached as Exhibit G to the declaration of…