Vongsvirates

Vongsvirates v. Rushmore Loan Management Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20211:21-cv-00012California3,861 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICHAI VONGSVIRATES, Case No. 1:21-cv-00012-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT

RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT (ECF No. 1)

SERVICES,

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE Defendant.

17 Vichai Vongsvirates (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on January 4, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) I. SCREENING STANDARD Notwithstanding any filing fee, the court shall dismiss a case if at any time the Court determines that the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis complaints, not just…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.