(PS) McManus v. NBS Default Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20212:18-cv-02047California406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRISCILLA McMANUS, No. 2:18-cv-02047 JAM AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER NBS DEFAULT SERVICES, et al., Defendants.

17 Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant Bank of America to respond to her Second Request for Production and Second Set of Interrogatories. ECF No. 89. The motion was taken under submission. ECF No. 91. Defendant Bank of America opposed the motion. ECF No. 92. Plaintiff recently filed an identical motion against defendant Nationstar Mortgage. ECF No. 95. These matters are referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(1) and 302(c)(21). Local Rule 251(b) establishes requirements for any party bringing a motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 through 37, including the requirement that the parties meet and confer and file a joint discovery statement. Here, no joint discovery statement has been filed with respect to either motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.