Montejo

(PC) Barth v. Montejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20212:19-cv-01874California272 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

facts and alleged damages; (c) a short procedural history; (d) an analysis of the risk of liability, including a discussion of the efforts made to investigate the allegations; and (e) a discussion of the efforts that have been made to settle the case. In addition, plaintiff was told that he must place his settlement conference statement in the U.S. mail addressed to the settlement conference judge, Magistrate Judge Carolyn Delaney, United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Plaintiff was also instructed to mail his settlement conference statement so that it is received by Judge Delaney at least seven days prior to the settlement conference. Pursuant to the court’s October 22, 2020 order, the settlement conference is set for January 19, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiff does not require counsel to prepare for the settlement conference. He fails to establish extraordinary circumstances justifying the appointment of counsel. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 33, 34) is denied; 2. Plaintiff’s motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.