Christensen
Christensen v. Goodman Distribution, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ERIN CHRISTENSEN, No. 2:18–cv–2776–MCE–KJN 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY v. (ECF No. 48)
GOODMAN DISTRIBUTION, INC.,
et al., Defendants. 16 On January 7, 2021, the court held a remote hearing on defendant Goodman Distribution, 18 Inc.’s1 motion to exclude expert testimony from plaintiff’s designated expert witnesses. (ECF No. 48.) Plaintiff opposed the motion, and Goodman filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 50, 51.) At the hearing, Philip Ebsworth appeared for defendant, and Andrea Rosa appeared for plaintiff. (ECF No. 22.) For the following reasons, the court GRANTS IN PART defendant’s motion. BACKGROUND The Complaint This removed diversity case involves plaintiff’s claim that her former employer, defendant Goodman (an HVAC supplier), retaliated against her after she made protected complaints 26 1 The operative complaint also names as defendants “Goodman Manufacturing Company” and 27 …