(PS) Johnson v. FBI

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20212:20-cv-02214California2,656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN B. JOHNSON, No. 2:20-cv-2214 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

UNITED STATES [FBI], Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Kevin Johnson is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) The complaint alleges that defendant’s “agents instructed . . . teenage girls to track” plaintiff in an effort “to create a . . . criminal out of person (child sex offender)[.]” (Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 4-5.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.