Woods

(PC) Shaw v. Woods

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20212:20-cv-01980California377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLIAM SHAW, No. 2:20-cv-1980 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WOODS, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested appointment of counsel. Plaintiff argues that he cannot afford counsel, he is unschooled in the law, restrictions on law library use due to the COVID-19 pandemic make conducting legal research difficult, and his case is complex. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The test for exceptional circumstances requires…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.