Dikran
(PC) McRae v. Dikran
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20211:16-cv-01066California1,675 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF
OPPORTUNITY TO WITHDRAW HIS
vs. OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., AND FILE AMENDED OPPOSITIONS IN
LIGHT OF RAND NOTICE
Defendants.
THIRTY- DAY DEADLINE
21 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian, Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz (collectively, “Defendants”), for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On October 23, 2020,…