Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20211:16-cv-01066California1,675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF

OPPORTUNITY TO WITHDRAW HIS

vs. OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., AND FILE AMENDED OPPOSITIONS IN

LIGHT OF RAND NOTICE

Defendants.

THIRTY- DAY DEADLINE

21 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian, Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz (collectively, “Defendants”), for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On October 23, 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.