Totonotnna
(PS) Michalek v. Totonotnna
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN WATSON MICHALEK, et al., No. 2:20-cv-0121 KJM DB PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHN TOTONOTNNA, et al., Defendants, 16 Plaintiff Brian Watson Michalek is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 15, 2020, the undersigned issued an order to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was ordered to show cause in writing within fourteen days. The fourteen-day period has long passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any manner. Moreover, on October 26, 2020, the Court received returned as undeliverable plaintiff’s copy of the October 15, 2020 order. Pursuant to Local Rule 183 if a plaintiff fails to notify the Court within sixty-three (63) days of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure…