(PC)Johnson

(PC)Johnson v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20212:19-cv-01752California2,430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES JOHNSON, No. 2: 19-cv-1752 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

E. HALL, et al., Defendants. 16 Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 5, 2019, defendants removed this action from state court. (ECF No. 1.) Pending before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 16.) Legal Standard for 12(b)(6) Motion A complaint may be dismissed for “failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). To survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, a plaintiff must allege “enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). A claim has “facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.