Icanotes-EHR
(PS) Pearson v. Icanotes-EHR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICOLE PEARSON, No. 2:20-cv-1720 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER ICANOTES-EHR, et al., Defendants, 16 Plaintiff Nicole Pearson is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On December 18, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion seeking to have “all documents pertaining to this court case” including “judicial proceedings” filed under seal. (ECF No. 8 at 2.) In evaluating requests to seal, the court starts “‘with a strong presumption in favor of access to court records.’” Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). “The presumption of access is ‘based on the need for federal courts, although independent – indeed, particularly because they are independent – to have a measure of accountability and…