Sandoval

(PC) Randolph v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20211:18-cv-00968California620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:18-cv-00968-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY

v. AND SCHEDULING ORDER

SANDOVAL, et al., (ECF No. 32) Defendants. Exhaustion Motion Deadline: February 12, 2021 11 Plaintiff Colin M. Randolph (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Benavides and Carrillo for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendants Sandoval, Speidell, and Benavides for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. Pursuant to the Court’s October 13, 2020 Discovery and Scheduling Order, the deadline for filing motions for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is January 13, 2021. (ECF No. 30.) Currently before the Court is Defendants’ January 11, 2021 motion to modify the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.