Avalos

Avalos v. MMDEOL Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20211:20-cv-01548California3,123 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE AVALOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01548-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT

v. JUDGMENT

MMDEOL INC., et al., FIVE DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

16 Currently before the Court is George Avalos’ (“Plaintiff”) motion for default judgment. Upon review of the motion, the Court finds the following deficiencies in the motion for default judgment. Plaintiff shall be ordered to supplement the motion for default judgment to address the issues identified in this order. 1. Compliance with Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Before default judgment can be entered, Plaintiff must satisfy the procedural requirements of set forth in Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “A default judgment may be entered against a minor or incompetent person only if represented by a general guardian, conservator, or other like fiduciary who has appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Plaintiff 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.