Gruen

(PC) Scarzo v. Gruen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20212:19-cv-00973California1,218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL SCARZO, No. 2:19-cv-00973-WBS-CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KATHLEEN GRUEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Currently pending before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint. ECF No. 13. I. Screening Standard The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.