Stoutt

Stoutt v. Travis Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20212:20-cv-01280California3,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 SHAWNTEL STOUTT, No. 2:20-cv-01280 WBS AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

TRAVIS CREDIT UNION, Defendant. 17 ----oo0oo---- In this putative class action, plaintiff Shawntel Stoutt claims that defendant Travis Credit Union violated § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii) of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”), which prohibits the use of an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) to call cell phones. See 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). Plaintiff alleges that defendant used an ATDS to call her cell phone number at least 18 times between January 24, 2019, and February 26, 2020. (See Compl. ¶¶ 20-32 (Docket No. 1).) Defendant has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Barr…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.