Gee

(PC) Bradford v. Gee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20212:20-cv-00714California1,422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No. 2:20-cv-00714-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. ECF No. 15 S. GEE, et al.,

SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF:

Defendants. (1) FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE

WISHES TO STAND BY HIS

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO

DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS CONSISTENT WITH

THIS ORDER

19 ECF No. 16

SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE

21 22 Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this 23 civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His initial complaint was dismissed with 24 leave to amend. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration contesting that 25 dismissal, ECF No. 15, and a first amended complaint, ECF No. 16. For the reasons stated 26 below, I will deny the motion for reconsideration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.