(PS) Dmitriy v. Eastern District Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20212:20-cv-00076California357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YEGOROV DMITRIY, No. 2:20-cv-0076 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER FEDERAL COURT and EASTERN

DISTRICT,

15 Defendants, 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned as undeliverable, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.