(SS) McKenzie v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20211:20-cv-00327California476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAMELA MCKENZIE, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0327 - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE )

WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v. ) ) FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) COURT’S ORDER ) Defendant. ) )

Pamela McKenzie seeks judicial review of a decision to denying her application for Social Security benefits. (Doc. 1) On March 10, 2020, the Court issued its Scheduling Order, setting forth the applicable deadlines. (Doc. 5) Plaintiff served a confidential letter brief upon Defendant on December 8, 2020. (Doc. 15) Pursuant to the terms of the Scheduling Order, within thirty-five days of the date of service of the confidential letter brief, the Commissioner was to serve a response and file a proof of service. (Doc. 5 at 2) To date, the Commissioner has not filed a proof of service indicating a response was served upon Plaintiff. In addition, the Commissioner did not request an extension of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.