Phi

(PC) Antonio Perez v. Phi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20211:20-cv-01248California674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO PEREZ, No. 1:20-cv-01248-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

BRYAN PHI, et al., ACTION Defendants. (Doc. No. 13) 16 17 Plaintiff Antonio Perez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 3, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order that required plaintiff to either file an amended complaint or notify the court of his intention to stand on his original complaint. (Doc. No. 10.) The screening order informed plaintiff that if he chose to stand on his original complaint, the magistrate judge would issue findings and recommendations recommending the dismissal of the action consistent with the reasoning set forth in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.