(PS) Expose v. Fay Servicing, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20212:19-cv-01866California731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LINDA ROSE EXPOSE, No. 2:19-cv-1866-TLN-KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO SERVE

v. FAY SERVICING, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 On September 17, 2019, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against defendants and sought to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The undersigned recommended IFP be denied and plaintiff be allowed to pay the filing fee in installments; the district court adopted these recommendations. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) Thereafter, plaintiff satisfied the filing fee, and the clerk of the court issued service documents in early July of 2020. (ECF Nos. 21, 22, 23.) In October, the court ordered plaintiff to state why she had not served defendants. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff responded, indicating she was awaiting a prior request to serve by mail. (ECF No. 27.) On November 13, the court withdrew its order to show cause, indicated that service by mail was inappropriate at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.