Pizana

Pizana v. Sanmedica International LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20211:18-cv-00644California1,662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 RAUL PIZANA, individually and on No. 1:18-cv-00644-DAD-SKO behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION TO COMPEL RESUMPTION OF THE DEPOSITION OF SANMEDICA v. INTERNATIONAL 30(b)(6) (GINA DAINES) 9 SANMEDICA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, (Doc. 111) and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants. 12 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Raul Pizana’s “Motion to Compel Resumption of the Deposition of SanMedica International 30(b)(6) (Gina Daines)” (the “Motion to Compel”). (Doc. 111.) Plaintiff and Defendant SanMedica International, LLC filed their joint statement directed to the Motion to Compel (the “Joint Statement”), as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on December 16, 2020. (Doc. 114.) The Court reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. The hearing set for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.