Kristeena Tinnin v. Sutter Valley Medical Foundation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTEENA TINNIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00482-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO AMEND
SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION, (ECF No. 10) 15 Defendant.
Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kristeena Tinnin’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for leave to file a First Amended Class Action Complaint. (Doc. No. 10.) The Court found the matter suitable for decision without the need for oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and vacated the hearing on the motion set for January 8, 2021. (Doc. No. 14.) Having considered Plaintiff’s motion, Defendant’s response, and the record in this case, the Court will grant the motion for leave to amend. On October 1, 2020, the Court held a Scheduling Conference and set a deadline of November 6, 2020 for Plaintiff to file a motion to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 8.) On November 25, 2020, Plaintiff filed her motion to amend the complaint seeking to include a…