CDCR

Estate of Michael Lee v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20212:20-cv-01161California1,925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTATE OF MICHAEL LEE, et al., No. 2:20–cv–1161–JAM–CKD Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE

ORDER

v. (ECF Nos. 43 & 52) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Presently before the court are two motions for a protective order staying discovery in this litigation: one filed by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) and one filed by the individual defendants, except for defendant Gorewitz. (ECF Nos. 43, 52.) The parties filed joint statements regarding the discovery disagreement, along with supporting declarations and exhibits. (ECF Nos. 53, 62, 63, 63.1-.2.) The court heard remote arguments on the motions on January 13, 2021. (ECF No. 64.) For the following reasons, the court DENIES a stay of discovery for defendant CDCR and GRANTS a temporary stay of discovery for the moving individual defendants. //// 27 1 These matters were referred to the undersigned pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.