Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC., No. 2:17-cv-01515-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GLOBAL AEROSPACE, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Defendant Global Aerospace Inc. (“Global”) and counterclaimants (collectively “defendants”)1 move for reconsideration of the assigned magistrate judge’s October 7, 2019 order granting plaintiff’s motion to compel and denying defendants’ motion to compel. For the foregoing reasons the court DENIES in full defendants’ motion to reconsider. I. BACKGROUND This is a liability insurance coverage action between insured plaintiff and a number of its insurers (collectively “defendants”) arising out of a settlement agreement between plaintiff and a third-party company. Jt. St. Re Disc. Disagreement Re Mot. to Compel Prod. of 25 26 27 1 Defendant Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance, Co. of America, which has its own counsel, did not join the motion to reconsider. See Answer & Countercl. ¶¶ 106−32, ECF No. 154…