Wise

(PC) Witkin v. Wise

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20212:19-cv-00974California3,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL WITKIN, No. 2: 19-cv-0974 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. WISE, et al., Defendants. 16 Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 64.) In the pending motion to compel, plaintiff seeks further responses to the following discovery requests: 1) request for production of documents no. 5 to defendant Wise; 2) request for production of documents no. 1 to defendant Matteson; 3) special interrogatory no. 4, set one, to defendant Matteson; 4) special interrogatory no. 2, set three, to defendant Wise; 5) special interrogatory no. 8, set one, to defendant Matteson; and 6) special interrogatory no. 6, set three, to defendant Wise. Legal Standard The scope of discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) is broad. Discovery may be obtained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.