(PS) Garcia v. Procter and Gamble Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20212:17-cv-02591California816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN GARCIA, No. 2:17-cv-02591-MCE-JDP Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE COURT DISMISS THIS CASE

PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY, FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURES TO

PROSECUTE AND TO COMPLY WITH

Defendant. COURT ORDERS OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS 17 On December 1, 2020, the court issued an order resetting an initial scheduling conference for December 17, 2020 and directing the parties to file a joint status report seven days prior. ECF No. 15. Defendant timely filed a status report. ECF No. 17. Plaintiff, however, failed to separately file his own status report or join in defendant’s filing. On December 17, 2020, the court moved the initial scheduling conference and ordered plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the court’s order. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order to show cause and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.