(PC) Haines v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20212:20-cv-01011California1,300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARCUS A. HAINES, Case No. 2:20-cv-01011-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) FILE A SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE Defendants. WISHES TO STAND BY HIS

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO

DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS CONSISTENT WITH

THIS ORDER ECF No. 16 SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE 19 20 21 Plaintiff Marcus Haines is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 22 action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 17, 2020, his initial complaint was 23 dismissed with leave to amend within thirty days for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 7. When 24 the thirty-day deadline passed, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause why this action 25 should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 9. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.