Kelso

(PC) McCoy v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20211:12-cv-00983California1,026 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

DISQUALIFICATION

STRONACH, et al., ) ) (Doc. Nos. 258, 272) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a declaration of bias and/or prejudice of the undersigned. (ECF No. 258.) Then, on November 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s October 15, 2020, order granting in part Defendants’ motion to extend the dispositive motion deadlines. (ECF Nos. 262, 272.) The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as a motion for the undersigned to recuse or disqualify himself from this matter. A request for recusal or motion to disqualify falls under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.