Vasquez

Vasquez v. Wyndham LaQuinta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20211:20-cv-01474California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RAMON VASQUEZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01474-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO APPEAR

AND FAILURE TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE

WYNDHAM LAQUINTA, et al., Defendants. TEN (10) DAY DEADLINE 15 On June 18, 2020, Plaintiff Ramon Vasquez (“Plaintiff”) filed this complaint in Fresno Superior Court. (Doc. No. 2.) On October 16, 2020, Defendant LQ Management, Inc., removed the action to this Court. (Id.) Also on October 16, 2020, this matter was set for an Initial Scheduling Conference on January 14, 2021. (Doc. No. 7.) On January 14, 2021, the Court held the Initial Scheduling Conference. Counsel for Defendant LQ Management, Inc., Jack Henning, appeared. However, Plaintiff failed to appear. Further, the remaining named Defendants Wyndham LaQuinta, Wyndham Hotel Management, Inc., and LaQuinta Franchising, Inc., have not been served pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.