Sullivan

(PC) Shorter v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20211:20-cv-01823California1,524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL SHORTER, Case No. 1:20-cv-01823-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXCEED 25-PAGE LIMIT v. (ECF No. 5)

SULLIVAN, et al., ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL

Defendants. (ECF No. 5)

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT

EXCEEDING 25 PAGES THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 19 Plaintiff Michael Shorter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on December 28, 2020, together with a motion to exceed the 25-page limit for good cause and a motion to appoint counsel. (ECF Nos. 1, 5.) In his motion, Plaintiff requests leave to exceed the 25-page limit due to “the number of defendants, complexity of the facts, and need for appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.