Epperson

Epperson v. Cederborg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20211:20-cv-01500California2,546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CHRIS EPPERSON, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-01500-NONE-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM v.

(Doc. 5)

DANIEL CEDERBORG,

21-DAY DEADLINE Defendant.

15 16 I. INTRODUCTION On October 23, 2020, Plaintiff Chris Epperson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint. (Doc. 1.) On November 10, 2020, the undersigned screened the complaint, found that it failed to state an adequate basis for subject matter jurisdiction and any cognizable federal claim, and granted Plaintiff twenty-one days leave to file an amended complaint curing the pleading deficiencies identified in the order. (Doc. 4.) On December 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed an “Amend Complaint – evident” (Doc. 5), which is before the Court for screening. After screening Plaintiff’s amended complaint, the Court finds that Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.