Roth

(PC) Gipbsin v. Roth

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20212:18-cv-03164California595 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, No. 2:18-cv-03164-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER CAPTAIN ROTH, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Clarence A. Gipbsin (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 22, 2020, the Court issued an Order revoking Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status and Plaintiff was ordered to pay the remaining balance of the statutory filing fee within 30 days. (ECF No. 77.) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) The 30-day period has now expired, and Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee to be able to proceed with this action. Instead, on January 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration seeking reinstatement of his IFP status. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.