Nueschmid

(PC) Shepherd v. Nueschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20212:19-cv-00084California569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CAMERON SHEPHERD, Case No. 2:19-cv-0084 JAM DB P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 R. NUESCHMID, et al., Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Four motions are before the court. On November 30, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to conduct discovery and a motion for appointment of counsel. On December 21, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion to compel. On January 11, 2021, defendants filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to the motion to compel. This court finds good cause for defendant’s motion for an extension of time. However, defendants’ filing shall address both plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to conduct discovery and plaintiff’s motion to compel. After receipt of all briefing on plaintiff’s motion for an extension of the discovery cut-off and plaintiff’s motion to compel, this court will rule on those motions. Below, this court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.