Luedtke

Luedtke v. Drozd

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20211:20-cv-01662California343 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES LUEDTKE, Case No. 1:20-cv-01662-AWI-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

v. AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE

TO PAY THE FILING FEE

DALE DROZD, et al., (ECF Nos. 6, 7) Defendants.

14 James Luedtke (“Plaintiff”), a federal prisoner, is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of civil rights by federal actors. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 21, 2020, the magistrate judge filed a findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 6.) The magistrate judge recommended that this matter be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. The findings and recommendations was served Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.