(PS) Grill v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20212:20-cv-00641California301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES S. GRILL, No. 2:20-cv-00641-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER THE UNITED STATES, and the U.S.D.A.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

FOREST SERVICE, and Does 1-20, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff James S. Grill (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this action to quiet title to a roadway easement. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 4.) No objections were filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.