(HC)Mann

(HC)Mann v. Garza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20212:20-cv-01799California640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN LOUIS MANN, SR., No. 2:20-cv-01799-TLN-AC Petitioner, v. ORDER GARZA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Nathan Louis Mann, Sr. (“Petitioner”), formerly a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 4. 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 5.) Petitioner has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that Petitioner’s copy of the Findings and Recommendations was returned, Petitioner was properly served. It is Petitioner’s responsibility to keep…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.