(PC)Colbert

(PC)Colbert v. Bell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20212:20-cv-01343California3,433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANNER DAYNE COLBERT, No. 2:20-cv-1343 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BELL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is former a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he was subjected to inhumane treatment at the Placer County Jail. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below the court will deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the required showing by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). However, plaintiff’s change of address submitted August 24, 2020 indicates that plaintiff is no longer incarcerated. (ECF No. 7.) If plaintiff wishes to proceed in forma pauperis, he must submit an updated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.