(SS) Ramiro Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20211:17-cv-01726California2,323 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMIRO PEREZ, Case No. 1:17-cv-01726-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

14 Defendant. (ECF No. 28) 15 16 On November 18, 2020, Shanny Lee of the Law Offices of Charles E. Binder and Harry J. Binder, LLP, counsel for Plaintiff Ramiro Perez (“Plaintiff”), filed a motion for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff and the Commissioner of Social Security were each served with a copy of the motion. (ECF Nos. 29-1, 31.) The Commissioner has filed a response to the motion neither assenting nor objecting to the requested fees. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff has not filed an objection or any other response to the motion. 22 For the reasons set forth below, the motion for an award of attorney’s fees is GRANTED 23 in the amount of $24,737.50. Plaintiff’s counsel shall reimburse Plaintiff for the $7,893.75 in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.