Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20211:16-cv-01066California840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT NGUYEN

vs. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EFFECT

BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., SERVICE (ECF Nos. 47, 90.) Defendants.

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

21 I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian, Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz (collectively, “Defendants”), for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On September 19, 2019, the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.