Dikran
(PC) McRae v. Dikran
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20211:16-cv-01066California840 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT NGUYEN
vs. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EFFECT
BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., SERVICE (ECF Nos. 47, 90.) Defendants.
THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
21 I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian, Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz (collectively, “Defendants”), for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On September 19, 2019, the court…