(PC) Foster v. Tulare County Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20211:20-cv-01596California541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONAS B. FOSTER ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01596-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S ) DEPARTMENT, et al., ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN ) CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS Defendants. ) ) (ECF No. 13) )

Plaintiff Jonas B. Foster is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 5, 2021, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendants Dr. Alla Liberstein and the Tulare County Sheriff’s Department in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 11.) However, Plaintiff was advised that he failed to state any other cognizable claims. (Id.) Therefore, 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.