Krpin

(PC) Cox v. Krpin

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20212:18-cv-02523California3,638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., No. 2:18-cv-02523 TLN DB Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHN KRPIN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, Ernest Lee Cox, Jr., is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint, as screened by the court, filed September 17, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff asserts a claim under the Eighth Amendment for deliberate indifference to medical needs. Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss, which argues that plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to state a cognizable Eight Amendment claim. (ECF No. 29) Defendant claims plaintiff has not alleged facts which showed that defendant was aware of plaintiff’s serious medical needs, that a serious medical need existed, and that defendant’s actions were the cause of the harm the plaintiff suffered. (Id.) For the foregoing reasons, the court will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.