Fraunheim

(HC) Klippenstein v. Fraunheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20212:21-cv-00086California489 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY SCOTT KLIPPENSTEIN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01705-NONE-HBK Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE

v. EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SCOTT FRAUNHEIM, (Doc. Nos. 1) Respondent. 16 17 This matter is before the Court upon initial review of the case, which was reassigned to the undersigned on November 17, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). Petitioner Randy Scott Klippenstein, 20 represented by counsel, is proceeding on his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). The petition was filed while Petition was incarcerated in Fresno 22 County, which is located within the jurisdiction and venue of this court’s Fresno Division. Upon 23 review, the petition challenges Petitioner’s state sentence and conviction that was entered by the 24 Superior Court of Sacramento, which is located within the jurisdiction and venue of the Sacramento Division of the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.