(PC) Perrotte v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20211:15-cv-00026California779 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY P. PERROTTE, No. 1:15-cv-00026-NONE-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

ON THE PLEADINGS

STACEY JOHNSON, (Doc. Nos. 220, 221) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Jeffrey P. Perrotte is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this § 1983 action against prison officers in the California State Prison, Corcoran. (Doc. No. 1 at 2–4.) At issue before the court is defendant Stacey Johnson’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, filed on July 29, 2020, after the deadline to file dispositive motions on June 10, 2019 as established by the governing scheduling order had passed. (Doc. Nos. 176 at 1; 220.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Pursuant to a scheduling order setting the deadline to file dispositive motions, the assigned magistrate judge found defendant’s motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.