Haskins

(PC) Webster v. Haskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20211:18-cv-01640California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS WEBSTER, Case No. 1:18-cv-01640-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

CORRECT DOCKET ENTRY FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND THE

COMPLAINT

HASKINS,

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT

Defendant. HASKINS TO FILE RESPONSE TO

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND

16 (ECF No. 63)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Thomas Webster (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained under California Welfare Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). This action proceeds against Defendant Haskins for denial of adequate medical care in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 22, 37.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.