Tate
(PC) Womack v. Tate
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, Case No. 1:19-cv-0614-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN
v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS H. TATE, et al., (ECF No. 32) Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Rodney Jerome Womack (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 20, 2019, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff did not file objections. On December 18, 2019, following a de novo review of the case, the assigned District Judge adopted the findings and recommendations, denied Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full to…