Tate

(PC) Womack v. Tate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20211:19-cv-00614California4,628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, Case No. 1:19-cv-0614-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS H. TATE, et al., (ECF No. 32) Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Rodney Jerome Womack (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 20, 2019, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff did not file objections. On December 18, 2019, following a de novo review of the case, the assigned District Judge adopted the findings and recommendations, denied Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.