Najera

(PC) Miller v. Najera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20211:19-cv-01077California472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN R. MILLER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01077-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. No. 17) NAJERA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Steven R. Miller is federal prisoner who proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On December 7, 2020, the undersigned dismissed this action, with prejudice, due to Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Doc. No. 15. Judgment was entered the same date. Doc. No. 16. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, which was filed on January 12, 2021. Doc. No. 17. “[A] motion for reconsideration should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.