(SS) Bentley v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20212:17-cv-01629California790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBERLY JANEEN BENTLEY, No. 2:17-cv-1629-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES

v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff commenced this social security action on August 5, 2017, and defendant filed an answer on May 3, 2018. (ECF Nos. 1, 10.) After the parties filed their cross-motions for summary judgment, the undersigned denied summary judgment for plaintiff and affirmed the final decision of the Commissioner. (ECF Nos. 15, 16, 17.) Plaintiff appealed. (ECF No. 20.) The Ninth Circuit vacated this court’s decision and instructed the case be remanded to the ALJ. (ECF No. 25.) The undersigned did so in September of 2020. (ECF No. 27.) Thereafter, plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 2412. (ECF No. 28.) The Commissioner opposed, contending the fee request is unreasonable. (ECF No. 31.) The Commissioner also contends that any award of fees 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.