Dahlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES DAHLIN, et al., No. 2:17-cv-02585-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, et al. Defendant. 16 On April 29, 2020, this Court entered a judgment in favor of Defendants. 17 Presently before the Court is Defendants’ request for costs of $2,446.85 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Def. Mem. Supp., ECF No. 125. Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Disallowance of Costs, which this court construes as objections to Defendants’ request. Pls. Mot. Opp’n., ECF No. 126. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ 22 request in part. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 27 1 The Court is aware that Plaintiffs’ objections are untimely by two days. See E.D. Cal. Local R. 292(c). It nonetheless considered Plaintiffs’ arguments in reaching its decision here. Local Rule 292(a) provides that costs shall be taxed to the prevailing party in 2 conformity with 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and “such other provisions of law as may be 3 applicable.” Under Federal Rule of Civil…