Insixiengmay

Insixiengmay v. Hyatt Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20212:18-cv-02993California4,551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

J. Scott Carr (SBN 136706) scarr@kcozlaw.com Abigail Stecker Romero (SBN 284534) aromero@kcozlaw.com

KABAT CHAPMAN & OZMER LLP

333 S. Grand Ave, Suite 2225 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 493-3980 Facsimile: (404) 400-7333 66 Attorneys for Defendant HYATT CORPORATION d/b/a HYATT REGENCY SACRAMENTO 77 (erroneously sued as both “Hyatt Corporation” and “Hyatt Corporation d/b/a Hyatt Regency Sacramento) Galen T. Shimoda (SBN 226752) attorney@shimodalaw.com 1100 Justin P. Rodriguez (SBN 278275) jrodriguez@shimodalaw.com 1111 Shimoda Law Corp. 9401 E. Stockton Blvd., Suite 120, 1122 Elk Grove, CA 95624 1133 Telephone: (916) 525-0716 Facsimile: (916) 760-3733 1144 Attorneys for Plaintiff Janice Insixiengmay, individually and on behalf of all others similarly 1155 situated

1166 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1177

1188 JANICE INSIXIENGMAY, individually and on No. 2:18-cv-02993 TLN DB behalf of all others similarly situated, 1199 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND 2200 ORDER vs. 2211

HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware 2222…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.